Strict rules on capital works plans could sink strata schemes & inspectors
By Michael Teys
15 November 2016
Sinking fund forecasts [Reserve Fund Studies] have been something of a joke to date.
there’s been no sanction for ignoring them
It’s something you’ve had to have, and you’re required to think about
them when setting levies but there’s been no sanction for ignoring
them. So when the admin fund budget goes up, in the never-ending quest
to keep levies the same as last year, the balancing amount has been the
sinking fund levy. It comes down a bit, and hey presto the figures work.
Well that’s about to change. The tiger now has teeth.
Capital works plans [Reserve Fund Studies], as they will be known, must be implemented, so far as practicable.
new owners suing the owners corporation
This brings us to our friends in the USA where similar provisions have
led to new owners suing the owners corporation for not implementing the
plan when funds have not been saved progressively for replacements and
The proviso, ‘so far as practicable’, will be used in defence but it
won’t cut it when the reason is to keep the levies the same as last
year when the price of just about everything else in the world is going
The first to be bitten might just be strata inspectors who fail to
notice that difference between the amount in the capital works fund and
the recommended closing balance in the study.
What does this mean?
Potential buyers of a condo re-sale
had better examine the Status Certificate and the attached audited
financial statements. If the information enclosed is accurate, then
(Most of the time, unfavourable
information is stated but it is hidden or difficult to read. A lot of
times it could be argued that it is deliberately difficult to
If the Status Certificate contains false or misleading information, a new buyer may have grounds for a lawsuit.
chapter previous next