Condo Nightmare
CHCH TV Hamilton
06 April 2016
People living in a Burlington condo building say it’s crumbling and
they’re afraid of what could happen next. Structural studies have
uncovered major problems and the owners are now involved in two
lawsuits.
Barb Tessier lives on the first floor at 2411 New Street in Burlington.
“No matter what you do to it, it continues to buckle and this is
happening in a lot of the units.”
The structure was built over 50 years ago and converted into condo’s in
the late 90’s. Tessier bought the unit for around $85,000. “Right now
the value is approx maybe $40,000, and why is that? Because it’s
collapsing.”
The condo corporation launched a lawsuit in 2010 seeking $20 million in
damages, the city of Burlington is on that list. In a news release the
city says:
“The building has been poorly maintained over the years. The decision
to defer necessary preventive maintenance was made by the condo
corporation.”
It goes on to say “The building met all relevant building codes at the
time it was constructed, and again when it was converted to a condo.”
There are some specific questions you can ask before purchasing a condo
or a home to avoid situations like this. Jason Truman is a partner with
Edison Engineers and hasn’t seen the building on New Street but says
“there is a story about structural issues in the building and we don’t
see that very often.”
Before you purchase a condo or home for that matter ask when it was
built. “Any building over 25 years old is in what we call a building
renewal cycle. That’s when some of the major components of the building
are requiring repairs and replacements.”
He says before you buy check the condition of the roof, windows, walls
and structural items like a parking garage or balconies. All of it has
to be listed on the status certificate.
Comments
Buying a unit in an old converted purpose-rental building carries extra
risks. The building may have old drain pipes, boilers, asbestos tiles,
galvanized water pipes, a dated fire panel: the list can be
almost endless.
This condo was a conversion so there would have been no Tarion warranty.
As far as Jason Truman's comments. He is right, about a 20-25 year old
building needing a lot of major repairs and replacements. That is why
the owners need to put money away in the Reserve Funds—and lots of it—
from Day One. It is obvious that they didn't do that at this condo.
One error. The status certificate would not list the major components
needing replacing, the Reserve Fund Study; a document that almost no
owner or potential buyer ever asks to look at, lists the needed repairs.
top contents chapter previous next