a. |
having direct or indirect contact with any employee, manager, security personnel, or agent of the applicant or member of the applicant’s board of directors; |
b. |
coming within 25 feet of the corporation's personnel in so far as the physical configuration of the property permits, and where it does not, keeping the maximum distance between herself and TSCC #2395 personnel; |
c. |
disturbing the comfort and quiet enjoyment of the common elements of the property; |
d. |
entering or coming within 25 feet of the management office located on the property in so far as the physical configuration of the property permits, and where it does not, keeping the maximum possible distance between the management office and herself. |
a. |
Ms. Wong’s behaviour constitutes workplace harassment. |
b. |
Ms. Wong has breached s.117 of the Condo Act by harassing, threatening, intimidating, verbally abusing and physically assaulting TSCC #2395 personnel; and |
c. |
Ms. Wong has breached the “Quiet Enjoyment” Rules in that she has created noise and nuisance, including yelling, using threatening language and attempting to instigate a fight on the common elements to disturb the comfort and quiet enjoyment of persons therein, namely the TSCC #2395 personnel. |
First | the moving party must demonstrate that there is a serious issue to be tried. |
Second |
the moving party must demonstrate that irreparable harm will result if the relief is not granted. |
Finally | the balance of convenience must favour the applicant. |