Decertify our condo board, residents tell Cambridge
council
Waterloo Region Record
By Chris Herhalt
03 March 2015
Cambridge—Fed up with appearing to the outside world as a disjointed
"condo-road," residents of 15 homes in Hespeler asked city council to
decertify their condominium corporation at a committee meeting Tuesday
night.
After paying for their own waste collection, snow removal, and having
city officials request they start paying a fee to maintain their fire
hydrant, residents Corey Somerton, Dave Vanderheyden and Dave Cahill
asked Cambridge councillors to take over their shared-access road and
absorb them as just another neighbourhood in the city.
"This condominium corporation should've never been approved by the city
in the first place," Somerton said.
He said the laneway that connects 12 of the 15 homes in the condo board
to Alderson Drive is plenty wide enough to accept emergency vehicles,
snowplows and garbage trucks, something often disputed when condo
groups ask for access to city services.
Vanderheyden, a resident of one of three homes attached to the condo
board but situated out of sight of the others on River Road, said his
home receives several services from the city but still has to pay a
$65-per-month fee to the remain part of the condominium corporation.
"We're being double billed severely."
The only thing that connects his home to the homes on Alderson Drive is
60 feet of pipe. He urged the city to assume responsibility for the
development.
"I can't believe the city won't pick up 60 feet of piping and assume
responsibility. That's all we have common with Alderson."
Cambridge Mayor Doug Craig said that the city should help the residents
of the condominium board explore their options, but said they should be
reminded that decertification is a significant change.
"We have to have further discussions with residents in terms of
decertification and what the implications are."
Coun. Mike Mann urged the residents to "try to keep their personalities
out of" their exchanges with staff and councillors.
Councillors voted unanimously to accept a report on the matter and
promised to raise it again at a meeting scheduled for March 24.
During a short recess, Cahill defended his approach of pressuring staff
and council members with an email campaign, saying it was the only way
they would realize the extent of the residents' concerns.
Note:
Here is a situation where owners bought free-hold houses in a common element condominium corporation.
Because it is a private corporation, the builder did not have to build
the road or all the infrastructure to municipal standards.
The houses should have been cheaper
to buy but now the owners are starting to realize that living in a
common element condo (much like an American HOA) can have much higher
maintenance and replacement costs than a regular municipal street.
—editor
top
contents
chapter
previous
next