Condo Act Review
Phase II The Experts Report
The Expert Report was been released on 24 September 2013. The public is
asked to read the reports on the OnCondo's website. The main reports are:
Executive summary
Full report
Here is the Executive Summary hat the "experts" are proposing.
Condo Office
A new umbrella organization, to be known as the Condo Office, should be
set up with four main functions:
• education and awareness
• dispute settlement
• licensing condo managers
• maintaining a condo registry.
The Condo Office would operate at arm’s length from government, but
with authority delegated by government. It would be funded by a
combination of user fees and a modest levy (estimated at $1 to $3 a
month) on each condo unit in the province.
Consumer Protection
Owner protection is to be enhanced by:
• Ensure “smarter disclosure” (as opposed to just more
disclosure).
These include an easy-to-read Condominium Guide with essential facts
about condo living, and measures that will cut through the complexity
and make it easier to find important and relevant information.
• A prohibition on selling or leasing back assets that are normally
regarded as part of the common elements, to the condo corporation, as
this can inflate the cost of the units. An exception is made for
specifically-disclosed, energy-efficient equipment intended to benefit
residents.
• A prohibition on deferring (and thus excluding from the first-year
budget) operating expenses -- such as elevator maintenance -- which can
leave consumers with the mistaken impression that their monthly fees
will remain at a certain level when they are actually scheduled to rise.
• Greater certainty over who is responsible for repairing and
maintaining certain components of the condo property, such as a balcony
that is used by only one condo owner but is part of the common elements.
• Boards should in future compile two budgets: an operating budget and
a reserve fund budget. The reserve fund budget would be based on a more
rigorously defined reserve fund study and would have to account for
deviations from that study.
Boards would have to notify owners of significant off-budget spending
from the operating fund or reserve fund.
• The trigger for notice to unit owners regarding changes a board
intends to make to the common elements, etc. would be revised from 1%
(or $1,000) of the annual budgeted common expenses in any given month,
to 3% (or $30,000) of the annual budgeted common expenses in any given
12 month period.
• Improved communication and disclosure of condo corporations’
financial data. A new online course would give owners a better
understanding of financial documents.
• Greater flexibility for boards to use the reserve fund for
alterations or improvements required by law, such as accessibility
requirements; and for green energy improvements.
Dispute Resolution
• The dispute-resolution arm of the Condo Office would help owners,
directors and managers obtain quick, reliable, impartial, trusted and
inexpensive (or free) information about the Condominium Act, the
meanings of by-laws, and other important condo-related matters.
• The Condo Office would also house a Quick Decision Maker empowered to
resolve disagreements by making quick, summary decisions on records,
charge-backs, proxies, requisitions, and owners’ entitlement to vote.
• More complex disputes would be referred to a new Dispute Resolution
Office, also under the Condo Office umbrella. The office would have the
expertise and authority to provide a quick, neutral, inexpensive and
informed assessment of each case.
Governance
• Minimum periods should be set for retention of condo corporation
records.
• Clear requirements should be put in place to ensure that corporate
records are easily accessible.
• The use of proxies should be clarified, and the rules for petitioning
meetings should be reviewed.
• The threshold for quorums at condo meetings should be adjusted as
follows: Up to two meetings could be called subject to a normal 25%
threshold.
If the quorum is not met at those two meetings, the Act’s requirements
would be deemed to be met and the third meeting would proceed with
those present.
• Qualifications for condo board directors should be raised by:
- Mandatory training for first-time members;
- A requirement that no more than one person from a unit may be a
director;
- Allowing for by-laws that require a criminal record check;
- Disclosure of legal proceedings between an individual and the
corporation.
• A code of ethics should be drawn up for board members, and a charter
of rights and responsibilities for both unit owners and directors.
Qualifications for condo board directors should be raised by:
- Mandatory training for first-time members;
- A requirement that no more than one person from a unit may be a
director;
- Allowing for by-laws that require a criminal record check;
- Disclosure of legal proceedings between an individual and the
corporation.
• A code of ethics should be drawn up for board members, and a charter
of rights and responsibilities for both unit owners and directors.
Condo Management
• A two-stage licensing program should be put in place to ensure that
condo managers across the province are properly trained and qualified.
The first stage of this program would set basic criteria for entry into
the profession.
The second stage would build on this foundation, advancing knowledge of
the field and developing appropriate skills through course work and
experience.
• A new Licensing Authority, with powers delegated by government, would
oversee licensing of condo managers. The licensing authority would fall
under the Condo Office.
Education
A central challenge of the Condominium Act review is to find ways of
encouraging condo owners to look on their homes as part of
self-governing communities or neighbourhoods and to understand and
accept some responsibility to make those communities work.
Education is thus central to the reform process
Information
If owners and other participants are to make their communities work
better, they need reliable, timely and relevant information.
This information falls into two categories: first, how key parts of the
system work, such as the board of directors or the reserve fund;
second, specific issues, such as the state of the reserve fund, the
reasons why specific items are on the agenda for official meetings
(such as board meetings), or up to-date information on a renovation
project.
Condo board transparency and
accountability
The review process has provided ample evidence that many condo owners
feel detached from their boards and building managers. Owners have said
that they know too little about how or why decisions are made and
executed, and they have called for improved transparency and
accountability.
The power imbalance between
boards and owners
The basic tools for solving disputes under the existing Condominium Act
are mediation, arbitration and the courts. These processes usually take
a long time and legal costs mount quickly. This reality can be very
frustrating for an owner
Method of implementing
changes
This report proposes that a significant number of recommendations be
implemented through changes to condo by-laws. Because it is often
difficult to pass new by-laws or amend existing ones, the expert panel
has agreed in principle that voting requirements for by-laws need to be
relaxed.
Next Steps
We plan to launch the third and final stage of the review process in
the fall of 2013:
• A residents’ panel will review the stage-two recommendations.
• Government officials will draft an action plan for implementing the
recommendations.
• Condo residents and other stakeholders will have an opportunity to
review the action plan.
top contents
chapter previous next