Private space or public park?
Revealing Toronto’s in-between spots
The Globe and Mail
AMANDA KWAN
27 September 2013

Commerce
Court plaza (Bay Street and King Street West): Nestled between gleaming
highrises, the space essentially looks like the backyard of the
surrounding office towers. But the isolation is part of its charm, a
retreat from bustling King Street, making this a popular lunchtime
destination in the Financial District. A water fountain is the
centrepiece of the plaza, which also features three bronze elephant
sculptures.
(Gloria
Nieto/The Globe and Mail)
The sound of gushing water masks the din of nearby traffic on Bay and
King Streets. The fountain, the centrepiece of the outdoor plaza at
Commerce Court, reminds Stephen Young of the ones in Italy and France –
a taste of Europe tucked within a cluster of office towers in the heart
of the Financial District.
Standing next to a trio of bronze elephant statues, Mr. Young, the
president of the advocacy group Toronto Public Space Initiative, casts
a glance over the plaza, designed as part of the complex by the famed
modernist architect I.M. Pei. “It looks like the backyard of all these
towers,” he says. This seclusion is what makes Commerce Court a popular
lunchtime destination for nearby workers, who descend from the
surrounding skyscrapers to lounge on the stone bench encircling the
fountain.
Although the courtyard is privately owned, it is open to the public.
But there’s no signage indicating that. On a recent Saturday afternoon,
with no office workers to populate the courtyard, the place is deserted.
Commerce Court is actually one of the better-known privately owned
public spaces (POPS) in Toronto. These are parkettes, plazas,
courtyards or walkways that developers agree to build in exchange for
height bonuses or permission to bypass certain zoning restrictions.
Most POPS can be found at the foot of condos or office towers. Some are
nestled into unassuming corners while others are out in the open. But
in many cases, people can walk by them without realizing these spaces
are publicly accessible.
As Toronto grows, adding tens of thousands of newcomers every year,
more pressure is being placed on the city’s public spaces – especially
its parks, which are becoming the de facto backyard for residents
living in densely populated neighbourhoods where private outdoor
sanctuaries are rare. But with limited land available and the rising
value of properties, creating new public spaces has become a challenge.
“Many people are complaining, quite rightfully, that there just aren’t
enough publicly accessible places to go to,” says councillor Josh
Matlow, who championed a plan, recently approved by city council, to
identify all the private-public spaces in Toronto. “There may be one
around the corner from their home. They just don’t know about it yet.
And I want to make sure that they do.”

Anne
Johnston Courtyard. Tucked between the two Minto Midtown condo towers
at Yonge and Eglinton, the courtyard is one of Mr. Matlow’s favourite
private-public spaces in the city but he thinks it could use
improvements. “It is nice although it looks inward too much, and I
think we need to do more to create a welcome mat for residents in the
community so they know they can enjoy it.”
(Gloria
Nieto/The Globe and Mail)
The goal is to make these underused spaces more accessible by adding
signs, creating an online catalogue and establishing a set of design
guidelines to ensure that future spaces will actually look like they
are meant for public use. So far, the city has identified 400 spaces
which may be POPS. The earliest date back to the 1960s, when the city
did not keep clear records of the agreements that created them.
“Typically, they weren’t even put into the title or deed, so many
developers are now dismissive of those agreements,” says Mr. Matlow,
who became interested in protecting Toronto’s POPS after seeing an
increase in the number of development applications requesting
permission to build over private-public spaces. The most recent example
is at Yonge and Eglinton Centre, where the real estate investment trust
RioCan received approval to infill a publicly accessible square with a
three-storey mall extension.
The Toronto Public Space Initiative says it’s good that the city is
trying to make POPS more accessible. “But if they use it as an excuse
not to develop their own public spaces, that’s a problem because [POPS]
don’t have the same role in our civic life as, say, Nathan Phillips
Square,” Mr. Young says. For example, if you attempt to use a POPS to
stage a protest, the owner can kick you off. “Private-public space at
the end of the day is not democratically controlled and democratically
open to the community.” This tension was apparent in New York – which
worked with the idea of the privately owned public space in the 1960s –
when the Occupy Wall Street protests were nearly kicked out of the
privately owned Zuccotti Park.

Rose garden at
the Four Seasons Hotel (60 Yorkville Avenue). Located next to the
historic Yorkville Firehall, the recently opened space includes a
maze-like garden complete with a rose-inscribed wall sculpture. “A mist
comes from it every ten minutes and at night it’s beautifully lit so
the mist glows,” Mr. Parakh says. “It also works with a well-designed
park adjacent to it, which is Town Hall Square, a city park. So I like
how the two work hand-in-hand to expand the public realm.”
(Gloria Nieto/The Globe and Mail)
The City of Toronto says POPS are not meant to replace new public
spaces but to help balance density and provide a reprieve from the
bustle of city living. Toronto has recently gained some new parks along
the waterfront, but in the downtown core, where land is more expensive,
new public spaces are rare. “As the downtown intensifies, adding small
spaces like this – places of retreat and relaxation, places to view
public art – becomes a lot more important,” says James Parakh, an urban
design program manager at the city who is leading the POPS project.
Cheryl Atkinson, an architect and associate professor at Ryerson
University, says the increasing density downtown is not the only
driving force behind the demand for new public space; there has also
been a change in Torontonians’ attitude toward public space. “It’s
completely evident if you spend an evening at Trinity Bellwoods Park
how differently people use public space now than they did 25 years
ago,” says Ms. Atkinson, who led a recent study, called A History of
Public Space in Toronto.
Back then, most people would typically go to the park with their family
on the weekend. Today, many urban residents are actively using public
spaces for daily activities – hanging out with friends, eating dinner,
exercising, reading a book. The public realm has essentially become an
extension of their homes. Ms. Atkinson says this is partly out of
necessity, due to the shrinking size of dwellings, but also out of a
desire to live an “urban life,” which depends on public amenities.
POPS can play a role in absorbing some of this demand for open spaces,
she says. It seems like the best compromise for now, given the lack of
new public land, but the city can do a better job of strengthening
their existing public spaces, she says.
Back at Commerce Court, Mr. Young points to a hotel-condo looming
nearby, a sign that more people are living in the Financial District.
He says the owners of Commerce Court could do more with the courtyard
to make it an actual destination where people go to hang out – not just
to eat lunch on a weekday. “There’s a little stage right there. They
could hold concerts here.” But for now, the only sound accompanying the
clatter of passing cars is the water fountain.
top contents
chapter previous next