Stratas may consider packing it in as land values soar
Western Investor
Carol Lee
23 February 2017

Selling strata properties for demolition and redevelopment purposes may
be more worth council's while than paying for costly repairs and
upgrades.
Recent changes to B.C.’s Strata Property Act allow for strata owners to
dissolve their strata corporation on an 80 per cent vote for voluntary
windup, which has spurred developer interest in older strata properties
for redevelopment purposes.
Prior to the July 29, 2016, change in the statute, the requirement was
unanimous approval, which was difficult to meet – one holdout vote was
all it took to defeat the wishes of a significant majority.
The new provisions bring B.C. into line with most other provincial
condominium statutes.
In anticipation of the new changes, developers have been busy
identifying feasible sites and likely candidate strata corporation
owners willing to consider windup and sale for redevelopment. And
strata councils/owner groups have been consulting with their advisers
to sort out the navigation processes required for such windups and
sales.
Repair cost may be mounting
Some sites, decades old, are worth more in redevelopment value than
non-windup, as-is value. Some buildings are not built to full allowable
or potentially allowable density, or are close to newer rapid transit
lines. Other buildings have such high deferred maintenance and repair
costs that a concurrent all-owner sale to a developer rather than
individual sales to individual buyers could yield owners greater
returns, while also relieving them from having to pay for significant
repair costs to the building, and from the mess and stress of carrying
out the repairs.
Complex, lengthy process
However, the termination and sale process, for both developer buyers
and owner sellers, can be complex and lengthy. There are requirements
for the winding-up, mandatory where five or more strata lots are on the
strata plan, including court order approval, procedural rules for
obtaining approval, and notice requirements.
The court approval requirement gives those opposed to termination and
sale the opportunity to try to convince the court there is significant
unfairness to one or more owners or holders of charges, or significant
confusion and uncertainty in the affairs of the strata corporation or
of the owners. Owners who are against windup could claim they cannot
relocate in the same neighbourhood at similar costs, and those owners
wanting to sell will argue the opportunity for highest return and that
the majority wants to sell.
This is new law for B.C. and as such, time will tell what parameters
the BC Supreme Court will establish to determine the best interests of
the owners as a whole, and what factors it would consider in its
determination of whether or not there has been significant unfairness
or confusion to deny approval. Older case law will be of some help, but
did not deal with windup under the Strata Property Act, and with the
new law the court may determine new concerns and thresholds to consider
before making an order for voluntary windup. At the time of writing
this article in early February, there is at least one court application
under the new law in process, and there will be several more to follow.
Perception of fairness
A good approach, for both the developer and the majority owners who
wish to sell to a developer, is to ensure there are terms benefiting
the sellers that show fairness to all owners. Provision for a long
turnover possession date where the sellers can live rent-free for 12 to
18 months after closing would show the sellers are being given time
post-closing to find alternate housing. Other accommodations could
include providing the sellers with moving assistance with third-party
service providers, or cash moving allowances, and/or providing
discounted buyback options to sellers for purchase of new units the
developer builds at the site.
Risk for developers
Some developers have considered entering into contracts with sufficient
numbers of owners to enable the developers to effect the 80 per cent
vote for windup only after it completes the purchase with those owners.
In such instances the obtaining of a court order approving the
voluntary windup and sale by all owners would not be a condition of its
purchase.
Buyers should understand there could be considerable delays and holding
costs to factor in if they opt to go this route, as getting court
approval is not guaranteed. Also, if a court does not order a windup on
an application, a developer buyer may be left, for the short to
mid-term, with an 80 per cent or more ownership of a property requiring
costly repairs.
Working with legal advisers in advance and during this new process is
suggested, for developers and owner sellers alike. If well planned,
such windups and sales could result in win-wins for both developers and
strata owners.
top
contents
chapter
previous
next